Note: Chinese version is put after the end of English version. Scroll down directly to the place where Chinese appears if you want to read Chinese version.
註: 中文版本放在英文版本結尾下方，如果你想閱讀中文版本，請直接往下滑到出現中文的地方。5. “Zelensky is an actor, not a material to be a president.”
Ans:
So why can’t an actor be a good president? Because you never see an actor be a president in the past? Because you only see lawyers and politicians become presidents? It’s ridiculous.
First, a lawyer’s professionalism is in law, not in national security, country infrastructure, finance, economy, global affairs, or any other matters. Those former presidents learn by doing; if they do good when they were presidents, that’s because they have smart brains and dedicate to their jobs, not because they were lawyers. So tell me, why a lawyer can be smart, but an actor can’t be smart^^?
Second, the same thought applies to politicians. A politician who never does other jobs before he/she becomes a politician is never an expert in anything. They learn by doing, and if they do good, that’s because they have smart brains and dedicate to their jobs, not because they are politicians. So tell me, why a politician can be smart, but an actor can’t be smart^^? Let me move further from this concept, you may say an actor can’t be a president because he doesn’t have political experience. Why the fucking hell is this important? A president becomes a president because he was a city mayor; a city mayor becomes a mayor because he was a legislator; a legislator becomes a legislator because of nothing – many legislator’s first job was a legislator since he/she graduated from college^^. So tell me, why does legislator can be a legislator without any work experience, but an actor can’t be a president?
Now, you may come up with two thoughts:
One, many legislators graduated with a Politic degree; they learn something related to politics in college.
Here is my answer – It’s certain that these legislators may seem more convincing than those without a political degree. However, those lawyers who become presidents of countries didn’t learn those subjects which students of politics learned. Didn’t those lawyers do good in their political jobs, too? Otherwise, why the hell did you choose them to be presidents? Not to mention some of them indeed got good credits during their presidency terms (and possibly come from you), didn’t they? And by the way, don’t even mention that many good legislators don’t even have a Politic degree. Many of you vote for one of them, didn’t you^^? In addition, I must emphasize – having no political degree is not the reason some politicians failed in their positions. I am sure some of them do good in their jobs.
Two, you may say that because those presidents have learned from the bottom; they start from a legislator, learn, and build their experience. If an actor wants to be a president, he should learn from the bottom, and go to be a legislator first instead. Well, I won’t doubt this approach is very good and sincere, and it helps many aspiring politicians to build reputations when no one knows them. However, first, if Zelensky already has a reputation and has confidence that he can do a president’s job without learning from the bottom, why not just directly compete for the presidency? Second, as I said, those presidents do good because they have smart brains and dedicate to their jobs. I don’t think relevant experience should be the major factor when we evaluate these political candidates, not to mention many of you voted for candidates based on their popularity without reading about their prior experiences^^.
A president has to have experience in politics is a common thought among many people over the world. I hope people change their views and be more open-mind, and I am glad that Ukrainians were very open-mind when they decided to vote for Zelensky.
6. – Ukraine women got raped and found pregnant:
“Is it possible to know you are pregnant in 25 days? Fake news.”
“Everyone is in ovulation period. In 25 days you will know pregnant or not (Mock).”
“Who are you going to cheat? You thought everyone is an illiterate who doesn’t have knowledge?”
[1]https://www.facebook.com/52news/posts/pfbid02dmpxhanWbdisxhzKqVw4spEVk6EYsosGqNavp3dsW9rnvvLUbzNtpXdgrKWBC21Ul
- Ukraine loss in a region:
“Every day I saw Ukraine won a battle, I thought Ukraine already won! Now I see Western media are shit!”
“Weird. This news media already said something different from other media.”
“The news is talking nonsense. This news media always say the Russian army is losing the war and all the commanders are dead.”
“Taiwan Democratic People Party’s media always said Ukraine won.”
“Ukraine can’t win at all. Many people still think it’s worth fighting? Russia retreats because it wants peace talks, but the news reports that Ukraine repelled Russia.” [2]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/rm5V7LP
Ans:
It’s very obvious that these are propaganda or brainwashed comments, if you know there is such a “propaganda” thing in the world and in your country and have a brain. However, comments in Taiwan have evolved into a situation where commenters said something looks with doubt in order to mislead people to question the authenticity of the news. If you don’t know whether the commenter’s doubt on a certain argument is true or not, you will still be very likely to believe that this is fake news, though you have no political stance. Ok, let’s diagnose these comments.
1. Comments on news of Ukraine women got raped and found pregnant:
First, is this possible to know whether a woman is pregnant 25 days after sex? Well, although I am a woman, I have never gotten pregnant, nor do I did a pregnancy test in my life. I just Google. According to Parenting magazine (which is the “first” search result in Chinese – you don’t even have to spend time scrolling down to find the answer you want), it tells me that you can have a pregnancy test 2-3 weeks after your last sex. 3 weeks is 21 days, so yes, a woman can know whether she is pregnant 25 days after sex. It’s true that it takes a longer time for many women to test positive on their pregnancy test due to some reasons, but it doesn’t mean 25 days is impossible^^.
Second, specifically, discuss the comment: “You thought everyone is an illiterate who doesn’t have knowledge?” Let me ask you, so why do you think this news is cheating people who don’t have knowledge? Which part do you think this news is cheating people? These people don’t even say why and what makes them have this thought; they just bluff people like you who are afraid of being classified as “someone who has no knowledge” or believe he is cheated, so people like you will agree with their point because of that^^.
Third, it appears that some of the comments are very rude. When women got raped, they mock those women: “Is this nonsense? How can she give birth to a baby three days after I fucked her?”, “I just finish sex with my girlfriend. After two hours she said she get pregnant. What a surprise!”. These are easily-identified propaganda or brainwashed comments compared to other comments, and most of the commentators probably have misogyny symptoms. Men with no basic qualities support misogyny, low-class crimes, and invasions, no surprise^^.
Further, though some people should be able to identify where these comments go wrong, some people don’t, including part of these commentators. So where do these comments go wrong? The news talks about women found pregnant 25 days after sex; these comments talk about 3 days or two hours after sex? The events aren’t in the same condition, are they^^? To those of you who only think these comments are rude without knowing why they are wrong: Someone is faking he knows something doesn’t mean he must know something; a similar example doesn’t mean the two cases can “definitely” be compared, either. Again, one is 25 days, the other one is 3 days – they are not in the same condition^^. For people who once believe or spoke such comments, let me tell you what a surprise? Men with no basic qualities don’t use brains to think what kind of example is a good example and to come up with a good example, no surprise^^.
2. Comments on news of Ukraine’s loss in a region(Mariupol):
This “fake news” tactic doesn’t work in the West, but it may work in Taiwan (Lots of likes on some comments saying it’s fake news[3]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/ rm5V7LP because Taiwanese have little trust in Taiwan’s news media – In the early age of Taiwan, there were only a few news media controlled by political parties available in the market. These media mostly delivered the news that favors a specific political party; in the current age of Taiwan, there are many news media that produce garbage news every day. The untrust with the political beliefs of a certain party makes people easily trust comments that mock news. I won’t say these people are all brainwashed; part of the people are probably online armies from China and Taiwan’s Chinese Nationalist Party(KMT); still, many Taiwanese may get brainwashed because of the above reasons, especially the old generation with low education degree – just as the situation in Russia, young generations of millennials and Gen-Z are more pro-democracy so less likely to get affected by such comments, even if they don’t know which part of the comment goes wrong and why is wrong. Since some people may get affected, let me talk about which part goes wrong.
First and the easiest one, if some local news report global events by translating parts of news from CNN, New York Times, or The Economists, western media which have long-time good reputations in doing verification and reporting the truth, these local news aren’t likely to be fake, since they are just translated the truth reported by these Western media. Ok. the news I cite only cites Russia’s government official’s statement, so it makes the credibility weaker. No doubt many Taiwanese would believe when seeing such comments stating “Fake news”. However, you can check other Taiwan media to see if Ukraine really lost in this specific region (In this case, Mariupol)^^. A good way to verify specific news is to see the same event reported by other news, or you can use my way: Google Mariupol to see if Ukraine really lost in Mariupol^^.
Second, war can have many battles in many regions. It doesn’t always have to be “one battle defines win or loss”^^. In addition, a war can be this country winning battles several times while the opponent winning other battles several times, too^^. According to your logic, Germany’s loss in World War II is defined by only one battle, and so does Japen^^. I will never be in an army; tell me, how can a woman who has never been in an army knows this simple logic of war while you as a Taiwanese who once served in an army don’t know^^.
Third, according to my second point, when someone “criticizes a specific point about a news” and therefore states news sounds fake doesn’t always mean the news must be fake, though we indeed have many garbage news in Taiwan (^^). You have to Google or use your brain to think whether what the commentator is saying is true. Therefore, news in which there are comments criticizing a specific point of that news is wrong doesn’t mean it must be Taiwan Democratic People Party’s propaganda in the news media. Contrary to what these comments said, most of the comments from these commentators I saw are the ones that are wrong^^. This is probably the combination of Taiwan’s Chinese Nationalist Party’s propaganda and the brainwashed thoughts of supporters of this political party. Such comments are harmful to the quality of Taiwanese. From one-side propaganda of Taiwan’s Democratic People Party to two-ways propaganda of Taiwan’s Chinese Nationalist Party, wow, Taiwanese aren’t creative in a lot of things, but I guess Taiwanese are really creative in infightings^^.
7.
(1) Why does Taiwan have to help Ukraine? What’s Taiwan’s interest to help Ukraine? Isn’t a small and not-rich country which aren’t recognized internationally better to make as many friends as it can by making friend with Russia? [4]https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1646808900.A.977.html [5]https://ptthito.com/gossiping/m-1645756609-a-8ac/ [6]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/vXlMwGj?utm_source=copyshare
(2) Why does Taiwan have to help Ukraine when Taiwan needs more gas in the future? Isn’t it better to not offend Russia for Taiwan? Russia has gas. [7]https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1646808900.A.977.html
(3) Withdrawing the business in Russia may make ASUS lose 50% of its market share in Russia.
Why does Taiwan’s ASUS have to stop its business with Russia while Germany can continue its oil import from Russia? It’s an ethical kidnapping — From a professor [8]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/zNOpZj6?utm_source=copyshare .
(4) Why does Taiwan have to help Ukraine when Ukraine sold many weapons to China to attack Taiwan[9]https://pttyes.com/Gossiping/M.1647223590.A.18C ?
Ans:
When Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov requested ASUS withdraw from Russia[10]https://twitter.com/fedorovmykhailo/status/1501840895221583879 , many Taiwanese have cited support for this request and stated they will stop buying ASUS products if ASUS doesn’t suspend its business in Russia[11]https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20220312edi011/ . However, there are also many Taiwanese who are against such a request. They think Taiwan is only a small and not-rich country which aren’t recognized internationally, why does Taiwan have to help Ukraine when it seems there is no interest in Taiwan.
(1) Why does Taiwan have to help Ukraine?
It’s supposed to be an easy question that shouldn’t exist at all. For many other countries, people will say this: Of course, you should help, Ukraine is suffering. I actually don’t want to longer my article by explaining such a question. However, the many doubts regarding this question in Taiwanese are unbearable for me, so let’s answer it. Luckily I don’t need to answer such a simple question from the basics, here is the answer from Taiwan’s Vice President Lai. In an interview in which a news reporter asked the same question, he explained it like explaining to a child, “If one day Taiwan is under attack, how will others help us? People will review Taiwan’s past. Taiwan is a bystander, why should I support you?” I am sure this answer is very clear. To those Taiwanese who once had such a question: You should examine yourself as being selfish and childish, including many people who think it’s simply “the U.S wants us to do that, so we need to do that” and “We Taiwan is the U.S’s dog”^^.
By the way, to many people who spread the propaganda which defames Ukraine (Probably politicians from Taiwan’s Chinese Nationalist Party): Look at Vice President Lai; he not only doesn’t defame Ukraine but also helps Ukraine and provides a good answer to the Taiwanese as if explaining to a child. That’s why he is a Vice President of a country, while you are not^^. ( I don’t have any political preference. I only speak based on truths.)
In addition, specifically answering the argument regarding “Why should Taiwan help Ukraine when there is no interest for Taiwan?”, I want to ask you: When many people are dying from war, you only think of your own interest? Selfish. That’s why I say you should review yourself as being selfish and childish. There is a similar view of “being afraid of offending Russia which may make future business in Russia difficult after the war” from many Taiwan PC brands. Again, many people are dying, you only think of your own interest? Do you know that many Western companies publicly support Ukraine by putting on “We standby Ukraine” words on their websites since Day 1 of the war? Not only such big companies such as Apple and Google, but many companies are also smaller than your company (since you are a well-known global PC brand^^), and you are thinking “afraid of offending Russia”? Selfish cowards. You said many Western companies are making revenue globally, not only in Russia? So are you^^. Let me teach you when should you be “mentally” worry about your business: If abandoning Russia makes it difficult to run your “entire” company ( “Entire”, not a subsidiary in Russia^^), that’s the time you should be afraid of “offending Russia”^^. Prove it with evidence to the public if that’s the case. By the way, isn’t it true what Vice President Lai said that if Taiwan is a bystander, why should other people support Taiwan? Let me teach you how to think according to his words: So is your own interest more important to national security if one day any country attacks Taiwan? Wow. Isn’t it true that you will lose revenue from many Taiwanese and Western people if you decide to “not offend Russia” by continuing your business in Russia^^? Some of you may say “not offend Russia” doesn’t mean you will provide products to Russia; you just want to keep the action a low profile, so you can do this “not offend Russia”. If reading this point makes you tired, so do I ^^. Isn’t you having such a thought thus not only makes you tired by reading such a question but also makes me tired because I have to longer my article to answer this question? Anyway, here is the answer: As I “already” said, many people are dying, but you are thinking of your own interest? Wow^^. Luckily any of the chairman or CEOs from these companies didn’t run for Taiwan President^^. Taiwanese, don’t vote for a person who doesn’t care about other people’s death but only cares about his own interest to be a president. You retort that Ukrainians are not Taiwanese? So what? Ukrainians aren’t humans?
By the way, don’t worry. You are not alone^^. In the case of Xinjiang’s humanitarian issue, many Western fashion brands revised or deleted their statements, or reversed their position after boycotts to some brands happened in China, including H&M, Hugo Boss, Fila, and Zara [12]https://fortune.com/2021/03/26/brands-respond-xinjiang-cotton-china-hm-zara-hugo-boss-fila/ [13]https://qz.com/1991038/hms-latest-statement-on-xinjiang-doesnt-mention-xinjiang/ [14]https://qz.com/1988896/under-pressure-in-china-zara-deleted-a-statement-about-xinjiang/ . Hope this makes you feel better^^.
( Note:
1. ASUS and many Taiwan PC firms have already suspended businesses in Russia after Ukrainian Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov requested.
The above argument is condemning these companies’ “low-profile” thinking and their reluctance before and after doing sanctions, because of the fear of “offending Russia”, not that these companies haven’t done sanctions; they have done.
2. In another one of my articles – No, we shouldn’t ban Russian arts, I did say we shouldn’t ban average-priced computer products such as ASUS; nevertheless, my reason is NOT because of “low-profile”. Again, the above argument is condemning these companies’ “low-profile” thinking. )
There is also an argument: “We simply do whatever the U.S wants”. This argument is wrong.
First, let me ask you, isn’t helping a country that is suffering from war the right thing to do whether the U.S helps that country or asks you to help that country or not? You only do whatever people tell you to do? That’s what makes you look like a servant, not the U.S makes you look like a servant^^. It’s your own mistake, but you blame others^^. Have your own independent thinking. Let me explain this further, if a poor child needs donations for his living and study, and the donation center is right there in front of your eyes, you only donate when someone else “orders” you to donate? Of course not, you donate when you feel you want to help that kid, right? Then Ukraine is suffering, why do you only want to help Ukraine only when the U.S “orders” you to do it^^? Again, have your own independent thinking.
Second, many of you think of the event that TSMC has been forbidden by the U.S to provide chips to China and Russia and think it’s a result of the U.S’s political hegemony. In fact, the U.S’s political hegemony is not the reason that TSMC has to follow U.S law. As this news said, the reason why the U.S can forbid TSMC to provide chips to Russia is that some of the tools (technologies) TSMC used to manufacture chips were from the U.S. Let me explain what does it mean if you don’t understand: TSMC uses some U.S tools (technologies) to manufacture chips for many companies. Of course, the U.S has the right to stop any company including TSMC to provide products with the U.S’s technology to Russia^^ [15]https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/us-sanctions-russia-serve-china-sharp-reminder-need-its-own-chips-2022-02-25/ [16]https://www.wsj.com/articles/chip-sanctions-challenge-russias-tech-ambitions-11647682202. (This is also the case in which the U.S can forbid TSMC manufacture chips for Huawei.) If you want to fully make decisions on your own, have your own technology instead of complaining “the U.S orders us to do that” without knowing why^^ (By the way, since it’s about the technology is from the U.S, the U.S’s political hegemony is irrelevant to this issue^^).
By the way, there is also a wrong argument regarding sanctions from TSMC:
In one news, a former legislator from Taiwan’s Democratic People Party Mr.Kuo criticized U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Gina Raimondo, because she publicly stated that “the United States buys 70% of its high-end chips from Taiwan”. He thinks this public statement has made Russia realize that it can strike the United States from Taiwan. “This Raimondo is really a big mouth”, he said. Mr. Kuo also said Taiwan has kept a low profile for a long time. He thinks that Raimondo’s words will definitely be heard by the Russian Federation, and Russia will think “turns out that I can start from Taiwan if I want to hit the United States”.
First, chips in the world are mostly manufactured by TSMC is a well-known fact globally since the global chip shortage began in 2020. Without Gina, Russia can still know it, okay? Even if there isn’t such a shortage, can’t Russia chase where the U.S’s chips are manufactured on its own? Or you don’t know how to chase the major manufacturer of a specific item in the world so you think others don’t know how to chase it, so won’t chase it on their own, either? This is not a secret, but you blame people who speak a fact that is NOT a secret, wow^^. Don’t worry, many Taiwanese are like you only good at blaming other people who simply speak a fact which is NOT a secret^^.
Second, Mr.Kuo and many Taiwanese have kept saying “low profile”, I wonder why you love “low profile” so much? I wonder why many Taiwanese (and probably including you) are proud of TSMC is known by the world when the shortage begins, now you are saying you want to keep a low profile? If you want to make money by running a company, you have to make your company known to people. Is there such a thing that you can make money while “keeping a low profile” by making no one knows your company^^? Russia should be also a market where potential customers to TSMC or any Taiwan company may exist if there isn’t this war, isn’t it^^? (And by the way, yes, TSMC did do Russia’s business before the war, so Russia was also a market to TSMC^^.)
Third, you criticized Gina can’t recognize the severity? After seeing my first point, now who is the one who can’t recognize severity when making a public statement? If you don’t understand something, you better keep your mouth close. I am tired because I have to longer my article for such an argument.
By the way, Mr.Kuo’s statement wasn’t simply an “it’s an individual opinion” matter. I see comments under the post, no one argues his point; everyone believes him or is stating anti-U.S theory or the pawn theory^^.
Read Part 3
Support me with donations and by following me on social media.
Every article I wrote is gone through days of deep research and thinking by me before it is written. If you like my articles, kindly support me, so I can write more quality articles.
( *Note: The unit of donation on the page is U.S dollars. )
If you like this article, please share the article to your social media page, so my article can be accessed to more people.
Please also follow me on social media by clicking the links at below, so my latest articles can be reached out to you.
Follow My Social Media: Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin
Reproduction of the article without permission is prohibited.中文版
5.“澤連斯基是演員，不是做總統的那塊料。”
答：
那為什麼演員就不能當好總統？ 因為你過去從沒見過演員當總統？ 因為你只看到律師和政客成為總統？ 這很荒謬。
首先，律師的專業在於法律，而不是國家安全、國家基礎設施、金融、經濟、全球事務或任何其他事務。那些前任總統在“做中學”； 如果他們在擔任總統時表現出色，那是因為他們有聰明的頭腦並致力於工作，而不是因為他們是律師。 所以告訴我，為什麼律師可以是聰明的，但演員不能是聰明的^^？
其次，同樣的想法也適用於政治家。在成為政治家之前從不從事其他工作的政治家從來就不是任何事情的專家。他們邊做邊學，如果你做得好，那是因為他們有聰明的頭腦，並且致力於工作，而不是因為他們是政客。所以告訴我，為什麼政治家可以是聰明的，但演員不能是聰明的呢^^？ 讓我從這個觀念更進一步說明，你可能會說演員不能成為總統，因為他沒有政治經驗。為什麼這件事他媽的這麼重要？總統變成總統，因為他當過市長；市長變成市長，因為他當過立委；立委沒有做過任何專業工作就變成立委 – 許多立委大學畢業後的第一份專業工作就是立委^^。所以告訴我，為什麼立委沒有其他專業工作經驗可以當立委，但演員不能當總統？
現在，你可能會想到兩個想法:
一、許多立委是政治科系畢業的；他們在大學裡學到了一些與政治相關的東西。
這是我的回答 – 這些立委似乎看起來比那些沒有政治學位的人更有說服力是肯定的。然而，那些成為國家總統的律師並沒有學習政治科系學生所學的那些科目。那些律師的政治工作不也做得很好嗎？否則，你他媽的為什麼選擇他們當總統？更不用說他們中的一些人在擔任總統期間確實獲得了良好的信譽（並且評價可能來自你），不是嗎？順便說一句，更不用說許多優秀的立法者甚至沒有政治學位。你們中的許多人都投給他們其中一人，不是嗎^^？此外，我必須強調 – 沒有政治學位並不是這些政治人物其中一些人在他們的職位上失敗的原因。我相信其中有一些人在他們的工作中做得很好。
二、你可能會說，因為那些總統已經從基層工作中學習了；他們從立委開始，學習並累積經驗。演員要當總統，就應該從頭開始學習，先做立法委員。嗯，我不會懷疑這種方法是非常好的和真誠的，它幫助許多有抱負的政治家在沒人認識他們的情況下建立聲譽。不過，首先，如果澤連斯基已經有了名聲，有信心不從基層學習就可以做好總統的工作，為什麼不直接競爭總統職位呢？其次，正如我所說，那些總統做得很好，是因為他們有聰明的頭腦，並且致力於他們的工作。我認為在評估這些政治候選人時，相關經驗不應該是主要因素，更不用說你們中的許多人在沒有閱讀他們之前的經歷的情況下根據他們的受歡迎程度投票給候選人^^。
總統必須有政治經驗是全世界許多人的共同想法。我希望人們能改變看法，變得更加開放，我很高興烏克蘭人在決定投票給澤連斯基時非常開放。
6. – 烏克蘭婦女被強姦並懷孕:
“有可能在25天內知道你懷孕了？假新聞。”
“大家都在排卵期。25天知懷孕。”
“騙誰阿？以為每個人都是沒有知識的文盲喔？！”
[17]https://www.facebook.com/52news/posts/pfbid02dmpxhanWbdisxhzKqVw4spEVk6EYsosGqNavp3dsW9rnvvLUbzNtpXdgrKWBC21Ul
– 烏克蘭在一個地區裡輸了:
“每天看到的都是烏軍打勝仗、俄坦克、軍艦被擊沉，還以為烏克蘭贏了呢！現在我看到西方媒體都是狗屎！”
“奇怪，這家新聞說的都不一樣。”
“又在胡說了。這家新聞說俄軍都打敗仗，指揮官都死光了欸。”
“民進黨的媒體總是說烏克蘭贏了。”
“烏克蘭根本打不贏，很多人還認為值得一戰？俄羅斯撤退是因為要和談，但新聞報導說烏克蘭擊退了俄羅斯。” [18]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/rm5V7LP
答：
如果你知道這世界上和你的國家有這樣 “政治宣傳” 的事，並且你有腦袋的話，你很明顯可以看出來這些是政治宣傳或很多人已經被洗腦的評論。 然而，台灣的評論已經演變成評論者說一些看起來有疑問的東西，以誤導人們去質疑新聞的真實性。 如果你不知道評論者對某個論點的懷疑是否屬實，儘管你沒有任何政治立場，你仍很有可能會認為這是一條假新聞。 好，讓我們來診斷這些評論。
1. 烏克蘭婦女被強姦並懷孕新聞的評論:
第一，是否有可能知道女性在性交後 25 天是否懷孕呢？好吧，雖然我是女性，但我沒有懷孕過，我這輩子也沒有做過驗孕。我只是Google來看看答案。根據親子天下（在中文 “第一個”搜索結果裡 – 你甚至不必花時間一直向下滑去找到你想要的答案），它告訴我你可以在上一次性生活後的 2-3 週做驗孕。 3 周是 21 天，所以是的，女性可以在性生活 25 天後知道自己是否懷孕。的確，很多女性因為某些原因需要更長的時間才能在驗孕中測出陽性，但這並不表示25天是不可能的^^。
第二，具體討論一下這個評論: “你以為每個人都是沒有知識的文盲喔？” 讓我問你，為什麼你認為這個新聞是在欺騙沒有知識的人？你認為這個新聞是在欺騙人的哪一部份？這些人甚至不說為什麼以及是什麼讓他們有這種。他們只是在對像你這種害怕被歸類為 “沒有知識”的人” 或相信自己被騙的人虛張聲勢，所以像你這樣的人會因此而同意他們的觀點^^。
第三，似乎有些評論很沒有禮貌。當女人們被強姦時，這些評論者嘲笑那些女人: “胡說八道。我幹完她三天後就生了。”、“我剛剛才跟女友辦完事，2小時後她說她好像有了（驚不驚喜、意不意外！）” 。與其他評論相比，這些是很容易辨別的政治宣傳或洗腦評論，還有大多數評論者可能有厭女症的症狀。沒有基本素質的男人支持厭女症、低級犯罪和入侵，不意外^^。
此外，雖然有些人應該能夠辨別這些評論哪裡出錯了，但有些人卻不能，包括部分這些評論者。所以這些評論哪裡錯了？新聞在談女性在性交後 25 天懷孕；這些評論在談性生活後的 3 天或兩個小時？這兩件事情不在同一個狀態，不是嗎^^？ 給那些只認為這些評論很粗魯無禮而不知道為什麼錯的人: 有人在假裝他知道某事並不代表他一定知道某事；有類似的例子也不代表這兩種情況“肯定”可以進行比較。再說一次，一個是 25 天，另一個是 3 天 – 它們的狀態不同^^。對於曾經相信或說過這種言論的人，讓我告訴你有什麼驚喜？沒有基本素質的男人不會用大腦去想什麼樣的榜樣是好榜樣，想出一個好榜樣，不意外^^。
2. 烏克蘭在某地區輸了的新聞之評論（馬里烏波爾）:
這種“假新聞”策略在西方行不通，但在台灣可能行得通（在一些說這是假新聞的評論，很多人按讚 [19]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/ rm5V7LP 因為台灣人對台灣新聞媒體的信任度很低 – 在台灣早期年代，市場上只有少數幾個由政黨控制的新聞媒體，這些媒體大多傳遞有利於特定政黨的新聞；現在年代的台灣，有很多新聞媒體每天都在製造垃圾新聞。對某個政黨的政治信仰的不信任使人們很容易相信那些在嘲笑新聞的評論。 我不會說這些人都被洗腦了； 部分人可能是來自中國大陸和台灣的國民黨（KMT）的網軍。但是，很多台灣人可能會因為上述原因而被洗腦，尤其是受教育程度低的老一代 – 就像俄羅斯的情況一樣，千禧一代和Z世代的年輕一代即使不知道評論的哪一部分出錯以及為什麼出錯，因為他們更親民主，因此不太可能受到這種評論影響。既然有些人可能會受到影響，那讓我來說哪一部分出了問題。
第一個也是最簡單的一個，如果一些台灣新聞通過翻譯CNN、紐約時報或經濟學人的部分新聞來報導全球事件，由於這些西方媒體長期以來在核實和報導真相方面享有盛譽，這些台灣新聞不太可能是假的，因為它們只是翻譯了這些西方媒體報導的真相。好，我引用的新聞只引用了俄羅斯政府官員的聲明，因此可信度較弱。毫無疑問，很多台灣人看到這樣在罵“假新聞” 的評論，都會信以為真。不過，你可以查查其他台灣媒體，看看烏克蘭是不是真的在某地區輸了（就這個案例而言，馬里烏波爾）^^。驗證具體新聞的一個好方法是查看其他新聞報導的相同事件，或者你可以使用我的方式: Google 馬里烏波爾，看看烏克蘭是不是真的在馬里烏波爾輸了^^。
第二，一場戰爭可以在許多地區有多場戰鬥。戰爭並不總是必須是“一場戰鬥定輸贏”^^。另外，一場戰爭可以是這個國家贏了幾次戰鬥，而對手也贏了幾次其他戰鬥^^。按照你的邏輯，德國在二戰中的戰敗是由唯一一場戰鬥決定的，日本也一樣^^。我沒有參軍過；告訴我，一個從來沒有當過兵的女人怎麼會知道這種簡單的戰爭邏輯，而你一個曾經當過兵的台灣人卻不知道^^。
第三，根據我的第二點，儘管台灣的確有很多垃圾新聞(^^)，當有人“批評新聞裡的某一點” 並因此說新聞聽起來是假的，並不代表新聞一定是假的，你必須要Google 或用你的大腦來思考評論者所說的是否屬實。因此，有評論批評某條新聞是錯誤的新聞，並不代表一定是民進黨在新聞媒體上的政治宣傳。與這些評論所說的相反，我看到的這些評論者的大多數評論反倒才是錯的^^。這很可能是國民黨的宣傳和國民黨支持者的洗腦思想綜合起來的產物。這樣的評論對台灣人的素質是有害的。從民進黨的單方面政治宣傳到國民黨雙向的政治宣傳，哇，台灣人在很多事情上都沒有創意，但我猜台灣人在內鬥方面真的很有創意^^。
7. (1）為什麼台灣要幫烏克蘭？ 台灣幫烏克蘭有什麼利益？ 一個不被國際承認的小國和不富裕的國家跟俄羅斯交朋友，因此有更多朋友不是更好嗎？[20]https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1646808900.A.977.html [21]https://ptthito.com/gossiping/m-1645756609-a-8ac/ [22]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/vXlMwGj?utm_source=copyshare
(2) 台灣未來需要更多天然氣，為什麼還要幫助烏克蘭？ 不得罪俄羅斯不是更好嗎？ 俄羅斯有天然氣。 [23]https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1646808900.A.977.html
(3) 退出俄羅斯業務可能會使華碩在俄羅斯失去50%的市場份額。
為什麼台灣的華碩必須停止與俄羅斯的業務，而德國卻可以繼續從俄羅斯進口石油？ 這是道德綁架。– 來自一位政大教授[24]https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/zNOpZj6?utm_source=copyshare 。
(4) 烏克蘭向中國出售大量武器攻擊台灣，為什麼台灣要幫烏克蘭？
[25]https://pttyes.com/Gossiping/M.1647223590.A.18C ？
答：
當烏克蘭副總理米哈伊洛·費多羅夫請求華碩退出俄羅斯時[26]https://twitter.com/fedorovmykhailo/status/1501840895221583879 ，許多台灣人表示支持這一請求，並表示如果華碩不暫停在俄羅斯的業務，他們將停止購買華碩產品[27]https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20220312edi011/。 不過，也有不少台灣人反對這樣的要求。 他們認為台灣只是一個不被國際承認的小國，並不富裕，為什麼在台灣似乎沒有得到任何利益的情況下，台灣必須幫助烏克蘭？
(1) 為什麼台灣要幫助烏克蘭？
這應該要是一個根本不應該存在的簡單問題。對於許多其他國家，人們會這樣說: 當然，你應該幫忙，烏克蘭正在受苦。我其實不想因為要解釋這樣的問題因此讓我的文章變長。不過，台灣人對這個問題的很多疑惑讓我無法忍受，所以就讓我們來回答一下。
幸好我不需要從基礎開始回答這麼簡單的問題，這裡有台灣賴副總統的回答。有記者在採訪中也問過同樣的問題，他解釋得就像在對一個小孩解釋一樣: “哪一天台灣遭受攻擊，別人怎麼幫助我們？大家會算帳啊？台灣是旁觀者，我為什麼要支持你？” 我相信這個答案已經很清楚了。給曾經有過這樣疑問的台灣人們，你們應該檢討自己怎麼這麼自私和幼稚，包括很多人認為這只是 “美國要我們做，所以我們得做”、“我們台灣就是美國的狗” ^^。順便說一句，給很多散佈誹謗烏克蘭的政治宣傳的人(有可能是國民黨政客)，看看賴副總統；他不僅不詆毀烏克蘭，還幫助烏克蘭，像在給孩子解釋一樣給台灣人一個很好的答案。所以他是一個國家的副總統，而你不是^^。 （我沒有任何政治偏好。我只根據事實表達意見。）
另外，具體回答台灣幫烏克蘭沒有任何利益的想法，我想問你，當很多人死於戰爭時，你只考慮自己的利益嗎？自私。這就是為什麼我說你應該檢討自己這麼自私和幼稚。很多台灣PC品牌也有類似的 “怕得罪俄羅斯，戰後可能很難在俄羅斯做生意” 的想法。一樣的事再說一次，這麼多人快死了，你只考慮自己的利益？你知道許多西方公司從戰爭的第一天起就在他們的網站上放上 “我們支持烏克蘭” 的字幕，公開支持烏克蘭嗎？不只是蘋果、Google這樣的大公司，很多公司的規模也比你們公司小（因為你們是全球知名的PC品牌^^），而你還在想“怕得罪俄羅斯”？一群自私的懦夫。你說許多西方公司在全球賺錢，而不僅是在俄羅斯賺錢？你也是啊^^。讓我教你什麼時候應該 “心理上” 擔心你的生意: 如果放棄俄羅斯很難經營你的“整間”公司（ “整間”，而不是只有俄羅斯的子公司喔^^），那才是你應該害怕 “得罪俄羅斯” 的時候^^。如果是這樣，請“拿證據”向公眾證明這一點。順便說一句，賴副總統所說的 “如果台灣是旁觀者，其他人為什麼要支持台灣”，這不是真的嗎？讓我教你如何根據他的話來思考: 所以如果有一天有任何國家攻擊台灣，你自己的利益比國家安全更重要？哇。如果你決定通過繼續在當地做生意來“不得罪俄羅斯”，你不是也會失去許多台灣和西方消費者嗎^^？你們中的一些人可能會說“不得罪俄羅斯” 並不代表你會繼續在俄羅斯做生意；你只是想保持低調，因此可以“不得罪羅斯”。如果讀到這點讓你覺得很累，我也一樣^^。不是因為你有這樣的想法，導致不僅你看這樣的問題很累，而且也讓我很累，因為我必須延長文章來回答這個問題嗎？無論如何，這是我的答案: 正如我“已經”說的那樣，很多人都快死了，你還在考慮自己的利益？哇^^。幸好這些公司的董事長或首席執行官都沒有競選台灣總統^^。台灣人，不要投票給一個不關心別人死活，只關心自己利益的人當總統。你反駁說烏克蘭人不是台灣人？所以呢？烏克蘭人不是人嗎？
順帶一提，別擔心，你不孤單^^。在新疆的人權問題上，許多西方時尚品牌在中國抵制H&M、Hugo Boss、Fila、Zara等品牌後，修改或刪除聲明，或調換立場[28]https://fortune.com/2021/03/26/brands-respond-xinjiang-cotton-china-hm-zara-hugo-boss-fila/ [29]https://qz.com/1991038/hms-latest-statement -on-xinjiang-doesnt-mention-xinjiang/ [30]https://qz.com/1988896/under-pressure-in-china-zara-deleted-a-statement-about-xinjiang/ . 希望這能讓你感覺好一點^^。
（註:
1. 在烏克蘭副總理米哈伊洛·費多羅夫請求後，華碩和許多台灣PC公司已經暫停了在俄羅斯的業務。上述言論是譴責這些公司因為害怕“得罪俄羅斯” 在制裁前後的“低調”思維和不情願，並不是這些公司沒有實施制裁；他們已經實施了。
2. 在我的另一篇文章 “不，我們不應該禁止俄羅斯藝術” 中，我確實說過我們不應該禁止華碩等平價電腦產品； 儘管如此，我的理由不是因為“低調”。 再次強調，上述論點是在譴責這些公司的“低調”思維。）
還有一種論點是: “我們只是做美國想做的事”。這個論點是錯誤的。
第一，讓我問你，無論美國有沒有幫助某個國家或叫你也幫助某個國家，幫助一個飽受戰爭之苦的國家不是正確的做法嗎？你只做別人叫你做的事嗎？那才是讓你看起來像僕人的原因，而不是美國讓你看起來像僕人^^。這是你自己的錯，但你怪罪到別人身上^^。要有自己獨立思考的能力。讓我進一步解釋，如果一個貧窮的小孩需要捐款來支持他的生活和學習，而捐款中心就在你面前，你只有在別人“命令” 你捐款時才捐款？當然不是，當你覺得你想幫助那個小孩時，你捐款，是嗎？那麼烏克蘭在受苦，為什麼只有在美國 “命令” 你做的時候，你才想幫助烏克蘭^^？再説一次，要有自己獨立思考的能力。
第二，你們很多人會想到台積電被美國禁止向中國和俄羅斯提供晶片的事情，認為這是美國政治霸權下的結果。 事實上，美國的政治霸權並不是台積電必須遵守美國法律的原因。 正如這件新聞所說，美國之所以能禁止台積電向俄羅斯提供晶片，是因為台積電用來製造晶片的一些工具（技術）來自美國。
如果你看不懂的話，讓我解釋這是什麼意思: 台積電使用了一些美國的工具(技術) 為許多公司製造晶片。美國當然有權阻止包括台積電在內的任何公司向俄羅斯提供使用美國技術的產品^^ [31]https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/us-sanctions-russia-serve -china-sharp-reminder-need-its-own-chips-2022-02-25/ [32]https://www.wsj.com/articles/chip-sanctions-challenge-russias-tech-ambitions -11647682202 。 (這也是美國可以禁止台積電為華為代工晶片的情況。) 如果你想完全自己做決定，那就去擁有自己的技術，而不是只會抱怨“美國命令我們這樣做” 而不知道為什麼^^ (順便說一句，既然是關於技術來自美國，美國的政治霸權與這個問題無關^^)。
順帶一提，關於台積電的制裁還有一個錯誤的言論:
在一則新聞中，前民進黨立委郭先生批評美國商務部長吉娜·雷蒙多(Gina Raimondo) 公開表示“美國70%的高端芯片來自台灣”。他認為這一公開聲明使俄羅斯意識到它可以從台灣打擊美國。 “這個雷蒙多真是大嘴巴”，他說。郭先生還表示，台灣長期以來一直保持低調。他認為雷蒙多的話肯定會被俄羅斯聽到，而俄羅斯會認為“原來我想打美國可以從台灣開始”。
第一，全世界的晶片大多由台積電製造，這是自2020年全球晶片荒開始以後，全球都知道的事實。沒有吉娜，俄羅斯也知道好嗎？就算沒有這次的晶片短缺，俄羅斯不能自己查美國晶片在哪裡生產的嗎？還是你自己不知道怎麼查世界上某個特定物品的主要製造商，就以為別人也不知道怎麼查，所以他們不會自己去查？這件事不是秘密，但你卻責怪一個說出一個不是秘密的事實的人，哇^^。別擔心，很多台灣人都和你一樣，只會責備一個只是說出一個不是秘密的事實的人^^。
第二，郭先生和很多台灣人常常一直在說“低調”，不知道你們為什麼那麼愛“低調”？我想知道為什麼很多台灣人(可能包括你)在短缺開始時很驕傲台積電出名了，現在你又說要保持低調？如果你想通過經營一家公司來賺錢，你必須讓你的公司為人們所熟知。有沒有這樣沒人認識你公司，又能“低調”賺錢的事情^^？如果沒有這場戰爭，俄羅斯應該也是台積電或任何台灣公司的潛在客戶可能存在的市場，不是嗎^^？(順便說一句，是的，台積電在戰前確實做過俄羅斯的生意，所以俄羅斯也是台積電的市場^^。)
第三，你批評吉娜不知道輕重？看了我的第一點，現在是誰不知道輕重就公開發表言論？如果你不了解某件事，你最好閉上你的嘴。我因為我得延長我的文章來討論這樣的言論覺得很累。
順便說一句，郭先生的說法，並不是單純的“個人意見”。我看到相關貼文下的評論，沒有人反駁他的觀點；每個人要不是相信他就是在說反美論或棄子理論^^。
閱讀第三部分
透過捐款和在社群媒體上關注我來幫助我
我撰寫的每篇文章在撰寫前都經過我數天的研究和思考。如果你喜歡我的文章，請不吝捐款支持我，這樣我可以撰寫更多有品質的文章。
注意: 捐款的單位是美元 – 美元兌新台幣約為 1:30 (1美元=30元台幣)
如果你喜歡我的文章，請分享此篇文章到你的社群媒體頁面，這樣我的文章就可以被更多人看見。
同時也請透過點擊下方連結來關注我的社群媒體(包含Facebook)，這樣你就可以收到我最新的文章。
關注我的社群媒體: 臉書Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin
文章禁止轉載References
Chrissy Slora
The articles published in this website are all written by Chrissy Slora. Chrissy Slora aims to make people learn about how the world can be better and provide her intelligent and wise insight by writing about various topics from technology to issues happening in the world. Follow her on social media: Facebook | Twitter | Linkedin